Skip to content

Analytics preferences

Help QUASAR EDU understand traffic and improve study flows with GA4 and anonymous PostHog events. No typed answers, no session replay.

Privacy details

Topic 17.4 · Supplement

Codominance and ABO Blood Groups

Everything on the monohybrid inheritance page assumed one allele completely masks the other in a heterozygote. Codominance is the case where that assumption breaks — and ABO blood groups are the required Cambridge example of exactly how.

What codominance actually means

Codominance is the relationship where both alleles in a heterozygous organism contribute to the phenotype. That’s a genuinely different situation from the simple dominance covered on the monohybrid inheritance page. In simple dominance — Tt, for example — the recessive allele’s effect is completely masked in a heterozygote, and only the dominant phenotype shows. In codominance, neither allele masks the other: both are expressed together, producing a distinct combined phenotype. That combined phenotype isn’t a blend of the two, and it isn’t one allele quietly winning — it’s both showing up at once.

The ABO alleles

Human ABO blood groups have four phenotypes — A, B, AB and O — produced by three alleles: IA, IB and Io. IA and IB are codominant with each other, and each of them is dominant over Io. It’s worth being precise about a detail that trips students up: there are three alleles circulating in the population, but any one diploid individual only ever carries two of them.

Blood-group phenotypePossible genotype(s)
AIAIA or IAIo
BIBIB or IBIo
ABIAIB
OIoIo

The AB phenotype is the clearest demonstration of codominance in this whole example: an IAIB individual shows both the A and B characteristics together, because neither allele is masking the other. Notice, too, that the A and B phenotypes each have two possible genotypes — a person with blood group A could be IAIA or IAIo, and phenotype alone can’t tell you which. That’s the same genotype-versus-phenotype gap the test cross deals with in simple dominance.

A worked ABO cross

Take one parent with blood group A and genotype IAIo, and another with blood group B and genotype IBIo. The first parent’s gametes carry IA or Io; the second parent’s gametes carry IB or Io.

IAIo
IBIAIBIBIo
IoIAIoIoIo

The possible offspring genotypes translate to phenotypes AB, B, A and O — one of each — giving an expected phenotypic ratio of 1 A : 1 B : 1 AB : 1 O. This example is worth remembering precisely because it shows, in one cross, both codominance (the AB offspring) and the genotype-ambiguity problem (a phenotype-A or phenotype-B parent whose exact genotype you can’t read off directly from their blood group alone).

Antigen biochemistry can explain why the phenotypes differ at a molecular level, but it isn’t required by the current syllabus objective — the genotype-to-phenotype rules above are the depth an answer needs.

What this sets up next

Codominance shows that a heterozygote doesn’t always default to “one allele wins.” The next page pushes the notation further still, into genes carried specifically on a sex chromosome: sex-linked inheritance, where the same genetic-diagram method has to track the sex chromosome and the allele it carries together.